Showing posts with label nazis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nazis. Show all posts

Saturday, October 24, 2020

LGBT History Month: Walter Degen

During World War II, the Nazis arrested 100,000 gay men, and imprisoned 50,000, many of whom were slaughtered. While this post focuses on one man alone, Walter Degen here stands for all the gay men who were brutalized and killed simply for being gay.


WALTER DEGEN
Walter Degen (nr 20285) was born on 4 January 1909 in Mörchingen – between 1871–1918 Mörchingen was located in Germany, today it is a commune called Morhange in North East France. Walter was a locksmith. He was transported to the camp within a group of 21 prisoners deported by the Stapo and Kipo from Vienna, Brünn, Prague, Troppau, Breslau, Schwerin, Frankfurt an der Oder and Kattowitz. They were registered in the camp on 29 August 1941. Walter Degen was registered both as a homosexual and a German political prisoner.

Paragraph 175 In Auschwitz, prisoners of German nationality designated by a pink triangle were arrested under Paragraph 175 of the German criminal code as “asocial parasites” for “endangering the morality and purity of the German race”. Paragraph 175 made homosexual acts between males a crime. The Nazis arrested an estimated 100,000 homosexual men, 50,000 of whom were imprisoned. The majority of the several thousand homosexuals arrested before the war ended up in concentration camps such as Dachau, Sachsenhausen, or Flossenbürg. According to the current state of knowledge, at least 77 prisoners of Auschwitz were persecuted for their homosexuality, of which at least 43 died. Homosexuals were among the most abused groups in the camps.

PERSECUTION OF HOMOSEXUALS
Conditions in the camps were generally harsh for all inmates, many of whom died from hunger, disease, exhaustion, exposure to the cold, and brutal treatment. Many survivors have testified that men with pink triangles were often treated particularly severely by guards and inmates alike because of widespread biases against homosexuals. As was true with other prisoner categories, some homosexuals were also victims of cruel medical experiments, including castration. At Buchenwald concentration camp, SS physician Dr. Carl Vaernet performed operations designed to convert men to heterosexuals: the surgical insertion of a capsule which released the male hormone testosterone. Such procedures reflected the desire by Himmler and others to find a medical solution to homosexuality.

The vast majority of homosexual victims were males; lesbians were not subjected to systematic persecution. While lesbian bars were closed, few women are believed to have been arrested. Paragraph 175 did not mention female homosexuality. Lesbianism was seen by many Nazi officials as alien to the nature of the Aryan woman. In some cases, the police arrested lesbians as “asocials” or “prostitutes.” One woman, Henny Schermann, was arrested in 1940 in Frankfurt and was labeled “licentious Lesbian” on her mug shot; but she was also a “stateless Jew,” sufficient cause for deportation. Among the Jewish inmates at Ravensbrück concentration camp selected for extermination, she was gassed in the Bernburg psychiatric hospital, a “euthanasia” killing center in Germany, in 1942.

Consequently, the vast majority of homosexuals arrested under Paragraph 175 were Germans or Austrians. Unlike Jews, men arrested as homosexuals were not systematically deported to Nazi-established ghettos in eastern Europe. Nor were they transported in mass groups of homosexual prisoners to Nazi extermination camps in Poland.

It should be noted that Nazi authorities sometimes used the charge of homosexuality to discredit and undermine their political opponents. Charges of homosexuality among the SA (Storm trooper) leadership figured prominently among justifications for the bloody purge of SA chief Ernst Röhm in June 1934. Nazi leader Hermann Göring used trumped-up accusations of homosexual improprieties to unseat army supreme commander Von Fritsch, an opponent of Hitler’s military policy, in early 1938. Finally, a 1935 propaganda campaign and two show trials in 1936 and 1937 alleging rampant homosexuality in the priesthood, attempted to undercut the power of the Roman Catholic Church in Germany, an institution which many Nazi officials considered their most powerful potential enemy.

After the war, homosexual concentration camp prisoners were not acknowledged as victims of Nazi persecution, and reparations were refused. Under the Allied Military Government of Germany, some homosexuals were forced to serve out their terms of imprisonment, regardless of the time spent in concentration camps. The 1935 version of Paragraph 175 remained in effect in the Federal Republic (West Germany) until 1969, so that well after liberation, homosexuals continued to fear arrest and incarceration. Source – United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

In May 1942 Walter Degen was transferred to Mauthausen concentration camp. It is not known if he survived.

This profile of Walter Degen appears on the site "Faces of Auschwitz", a collaboration between the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, a Brazilian photo colorization specialist Marina Amaral, and a dedicated team of academics, journalists and volunteers. The goal of the project is to honor the memory and lives of Auschwitz-Birkenau prisoners by colorizing registration photographs culled from the museum’s archive and sharing individual stories of those whose faces were photographed.

In this age where Fascism is once gain on the rise globally but most shockingly in the United States, at a time when xenophobic hate encouraged by the current President runs rampant, and the Supreme Court of the United States is about to install a justice whose extreme, radicalized ideas threaten the future of gay rights (among MANY other rights), we need to remember how far it can all go, now more than ever.

https://facesofauschwitz.com/gallery/walter-degen/

Sunday, December 29, 2019

Just watched...

...Terrence Malick's newest masterpiece "A Hidden Life."


Just before the holiday, I had the privilege of seeing "A Hidden Life," Terrence Malick's tenth feature film. Regular readers know I am a huge Malick fan, as evidenced by the presence of several of his films in my All-Time Favorite Films list to the right.

The first thing one notices with this most recent film is his return to a more structured story. I believe his last three projects, "To The Wonder," "Knight of Cups," and "Song To Song" are a trilogy about being lost in a life without meaning in the 21st century. We were witness to a kind of confusion, ennui, and an inability to commit oneself to anything or anyone, including oneself. Malick's approach to this subject matter was even more loose, Impressionistic, and improvisational than he has been in the past and the results were criticized for lacking a clear plot. I have a high tolerance for soft narratives and while it is true that the films show a lot of characters simply wandering around certain locations either staring at each other or off in the distance, I felt the films were a perfect product of what Malick was trying to say and portray.

But with "A Hidden Life," Malick told an audience at a rare Q&A in 2016 that he has "repented and gone back to working with a much tighter script" but went on to qualify that with the idea that "it actually makes it easier to improvise when you have rails underneath you."

Based on the life story of Franz Jägerstätter (played with great presence by August Diehl), much of the action takes place in the little Austrian village of St. Radegund where Jägerstätter and his wife (masterfully played by Valerie Pachner), like most villagers, tend a farm. Theirs is a simple way of life. Of course Malick is a master of the landscape shot (swoon over most every scene in "The New World" and cry with nostalgia at the lovely hometown shots in "Tree of Life") and there are absolutely breathtaking images of Austrian peaks and high-altitude meadows, but what struck me immediately was the backbreaking, merciless, unending work daily life must have been for these people. Seeing them use little hand held scythes to cut down grass as my attention pulled out to reveal an entire mountainside made me ache just watching it.

But this is 1939 and the Nazis have conscripted him to serve in the military. Yet even though they are isolated in a mountain village in Austria, he and his family know exactly what is going on in Germany and the rest of the world, and he knows that what the Reich is, is wrong. He refuses to swear an oath to Hitler and he is taken into custody for a trial. Jailed and beaten, the Nazis eventually kill him. And all the while his jailers, the village mayor, the clergy tell him to simply take the oath and swear loyalty to Hitler because there is no harm in it, he can say the words and not mean them. But Jägerstätter understands the existential dilemma as well as the very real danger of trying to walk such a line. There were thousands who did just that and while they may have saved their lives and the lives of their families, they enabled millions of people to lose theirs. And they have to--or had to--live with that knowledge, that they enabled absolute evil. Principles, morality, and ethics are not concepts that can be chosen or followed only when convenient. But having said that, I am not sure what I myself would have done. Perhaps I would have sworn the oath and then worked with the Resistance. His is a bravery I am not sure I--or many of us--possess.

In fact, the film's title refers to something else Jägerstätter was told, over and over: that one person, one single act, a hidden life out of the view of the world, cannot make a difference. But this film and the story of the real life Jägerstätter proves that it can. (The story of Jägerstätter's life did not come to the attention of the general public until the 1960s...and in 2007, he was declared a martyr and beatified by the Catholic Church. The same church that actually aided and conspired with the Nazis...I'm just saying. Read about his life here.)

Even though there is a tighter script, and a clear narrative with a beginning and end, this is still a beautiful, glorious Malick film with all that entails. The heart and mind are still given equal, albeit dream-like, screen time. The aforementioned concepts of principles, morality, and ethics along with philosophical and spiritual ideas are held aloft in the stunningly beautiful and pristine Austrian mountains. Like I said, Malick really knows how to choose and lens phenomenal landscapes. And even when he is shooting interior scenes, he still composes and shoots them (with wide angle lenses) like landscapes. Look at the scenes in the Bishop's office and the church in "A Hidden Life" and marvel at how a desk and stacks of books can look like the mountain landscape outside. It is a gorgeous and subtle motif.


Recommend? Yes. Beautiful for the eyes but also for the heart and mind. And it is no accident that a film portraying a man refusing to swear loyalty to a sick, egomaniacal Fascist was made and released in this current political climate.

http://www.foxsearchlight.com/ahiddenlife/